[ModLib] Designation for regular binding style variation?
kamins at modernlib.com
Fri Jun 24 15:55:33 EDT 2011
While I agree that a chronological designation is best, I'm EXTREMELY
reluctant to change an established designation. It's been as it is for
years, and I think changing an established designation for a new one
would cause a mess.
On Jun 24, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Darrell Johnson wrote:
> I recommend changing 5 to 5B and 5* to 5C. That puts them in
> chronologocal and alphabetical order. Then on the website you can
> simply note that the two variants (5A and 5C) weren't distinguished
> yet in The Price Guide so Toledano 5 would have been taken to refer
> to 5B (generally) and all three collectively.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ModLib