[ModLib] Designation for regular binding style variation?

Scot Kamins kamins at modernlib.com
Fri Jun 24 15:55:33 EDT 2011


While I agree that a chronological designation  is best, I'm EXTREMELY  
reluctant to change an established designation. It's been as it is for  
years, and I think changing an established designation for a new one  
would cause a mess.

On Jun 24, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Darrell Johnson wrote:

> I recommend changing 5 to 5B and 5* to 5C.  That puts them in  
> chronologocal and alphabetical order. Then on the website you can  
> simply note that the two variants (5A and 5C) weren't distinguished  
> yet in The Price Guide so Toledano 5 would have been taken to refer  
> to 5B (generally) and all three collectively.

Scot Kamins
.......................
Practice Kindness





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://thuban.owu.edu/pipermail/modlib/attachments/20110624/0c6bc919/attachment.html


More information about the ModLib mailing list