[ModLib] Interesting Buckram Variations

[Scot Kamins]

On Aug 14, 2007, at 6:47 PM, JOSEPH HILL wrote:

> Well, this no number on the spine bit has got me going. When I  
> first reported 310.1, I did not note the lack of the number, as I  
> had assumed that the number was worn off of the spine. However, now  
> that I look
> at the book, I find the rest of the text on the spine to be bright  
> and clear.

Joe, is that 310.1 or 311.1?

Scot Kamins
..............
"It was an American tradition, like fathers chasing kids around with  
power tools." - from an anonymous high school essay