Fwd: Re: Comments and Observations on New Feature

J B Krygier jbkrygier at owu.edu
Thu May 12 09:34:13 EDT 2005

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Scot Kamins <kamins at dogeared.com>
> Subject: Re: Comments and Observations on New Feature
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:10:17 -0700
> To: modlib at algol.owu.edu
>   I used Shaw as an example. Both the Shaw and the Racine would be R1's
> in my scheme - dead common. E. F, G - they're still dead-common.
>   (By the way, I stole the R scarcity scale idea from coin collecting,
> except that in coin collecting some of the R scales go to MUCH higher
> number.)
> I think that 25 or more is too many to be practical in terms of rarity
> (although perhaps it's fine in terms of price - although even there I
> think the distinctions are too fine-grained, and don't seem to hld up
> in the marketplace) ; that's why I propose a much smaller number.
> On May 11, 2005, at 8:36 PM, JOSEPH HILL wrote:
>> Yes,and just to make more of a muddle,for example---
>> I believe that I see on any given day as many ML titles in the market
>> as
>> anyone  on this list....and I say we have three copies of 194.1 to
>> every
>> one copy of the Shaw...so,who is right?

j   b   k r y g i e r

a s s o c i a t e   p r o f e s s o r   o f   g e o g r a p h y
o h i o   w e s l e y a n   u n i v e r s i t y
g e o l o g y   a n d   g e o g r a p h y
d e l a w a r e   o h   4 3 0 1 5

pho  740 368 3622   |   fax  740 368 3999

jbkrygier at owu.edu   |   http://www.owu.edu/~jbkrygie/

More information about the ModLib mailing list