kamins at dogeared.com
Thu Jan 16 11:34:45 EST 2003
At 10:10 AM -0500 1/16/03, j b krygier wrote:
>These books may also be under-priced because they
>are not particularly well made and vary from the
>classic Modern Library form. The attraction
>of pre-1970 MLs is in part the content, but also
>the bindings, book design, djs, etc. (all well
>documented in the article by Gordon N., noted
>in a recent MODLIB posting).
>Any opinions? Is this sacrilege? Am I voted off
If you are, then I'm in the boat with you. I too collected post-1970
books for a bit, but then traded them all away for EXACTLY the
reasons you give.
"Perfect" binding, indeed!!!
- Scot Kamins
More information about the ModLib