Another Oversized Leatherette?

jpete9530 at msn.com jpete9530 at msn.com
Fri Feb 14 16:48:04 EST 2003


I have another leatherette (stated 1st, no DJ) 1928 Anatole France, Revolt of the Angels.  Here, too, the reason seems to be the size of the plates.  Are there others?

John Peterson

----- Original Message -----
From: John M. Wolansky
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:48 PM
To: modlib at algol.owu.edu
Subject: HEY, JIMMY WILLIAMSON ...

... I sort my collection just as you do.

I didn't understand your reference to Lost Weekend, so I checked my
bookshelf.  Never realized it was oversized for the time!  Looking at the
print, thought, appears the plates they used were a bit high for the normal
ML cover 8 size, so they "supersized" it.

Actually, there was also an oversized leatherette.  The first ML of The
Rainbow by Lawrence was clearly 1/4" taller than the standard leatherette
and appears to have been manufactured that way to accommodate the plates.

JMW

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jimmy Williamson" <jwslaw at jimmywilliamson.com>
To: <modlib at algol.owu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: Number sorters (was Re: [::tap tap::] Is this thing on?)


> i am a number sorter, but, in categories,
>
> you got your giants
> regular
> 70s series
> flex bindings
> 80s
> 90s
> buckram
> illustrateds
> paperbacks
> and two different sizes of balloon bindings(what is that all
> about)
> oh, yeah, and lost weekend
> big pain, but just as good as any other
>
> btw, i vote no selling on the list , except the rarities noted
> jw
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-modlib at algol.owu.edu [mailto:owner-modlib at algol.owu.edu]On
> Behalf Of j b krygier
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:53 PM
> To: modlib at algol.owu.edu
> Subject: Number sorters (was Re: [::tap tap::] Is this thing on?)
>
>
> jpete9530 at msn.com wrote:
>
> > Since I have my ML books arranged by number,
>
> Egad, a number sorter.  Does not the different
> heights of the books perturb you?
>
> I used to have my MLs all mixed in with other series
> books (Everyman's etc) in alphabetical order, but now
> the MLs are segregated and sorted by binding type, then
> alphabetically.  My two year old has hit upon a very
> different and interesting way of organizing my MLs,
> but I have yet to fathom the logic behind it.
>
> jk
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://thuban.owu.edu/pipermail/modlib/attachments/20030214/fd3a6093/attachment.html


More information about the ModLib mailing list