sbiederm at nova.umuc.edu
Sat Apr 12 10:49:49 EDT 2003
I don't think we can have co-firsts. There were clearly two different
printings of the dust jacket, one of which came first. I believe it was
the 278-title edition, but if there is a question I would rather say the
priority is unknown than call both firsts.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 acpertusi at aol.com wrote:
> hello group:
> the pages in the book that have the blank reverse of the dust jacket are much
> thicker than the 278 first edition.
> Is it possible, due to lack of more information, that we have the first book
> and dj variants that can be considered co-firsts?
> anthony pertusi
More information about the ModLib